Backend and API engineers
Services, integrations and the layer between systems that were never designed to talk to each other.
Staff augmentation
You're not renting hours. You're adding people who already build and operate production systems together, and who bring that way of working with them.
The problem
The roadmap doesn't wait for the hiring process. The problem usually isn't that you can't hire — it's that the calendar moved first.
The product shipped, adoption went up, and now the same engineers maintain what exists and build what's next. Both slow down.
A migration, an ERP integration, a mobile app. Hiring for it permanently is the wrong shape, and consultancies want to sell you the whole project instead.
Someone left mid-delivery. Every week the seat stays empty, the people around it absorb the work and the delivery date moves quietly.
Roles
We add people to the team you already have, working in your process, your tools and your sprint — not in a parallel project with its own rules.
Services, integrations and the layer between systems that were never designed to talk to each other.
Web applications and native or hybrid mobile apps, connected to the systems behind them.
Middleware, data flows between platforms, and process automation across tools you already pay for.
Pipelines, dashboards and the reporting layer that turns an operation into numbers someone can act on.
The people who keep what's built running: monitoring, incidents, releases and the work nobody budgets for until it breaks.
Tell us what the seat has to cover. If we can't staff it well, we'll say so instead of sending you whoever is free.
The difference
A résumé tells you what someone has done. What it can't carry is a way of working.
We build and operate digital ecosystems — software, integrations, data and the processes on top — and the engineers who join your team come from that.
They arrive knowing how a system behaves in production, because they've been the ones on the other end when it broke.
Not a seat filled, but a way of building that already survived contact with real operations.
The model
These two get sold as the same thing and they're not. The difference is who decides.
Model 1
You direct the work. Your backlog, your priorities, your sprint.
See detailModel 2
We direct the work, against agreed scope.
See detailWe do both. If what you describe fits the other model better, we'll say so — sometimes the answer is that we deliver the project end to end, and it's cheaper for everyone than finding out in month three.
Nearshore
We work from Colombia. That's a geographic fact with three practical consequences.
Colombia sits within the US time-zone band, so the working day overlaps with yours — reviews and decisions happen while both teams are at their desks.
Stand-ups, reviews and incidents happen live, not through a document written while you slept.
The engineers work in English and in your tools. The point of nearshore isn't the distance on a map — it's that the day-to-day feels like one team.
Proof
Built by the same team you'd be adding to yours — and we still run them every day. That's the part a staffing company can't show you.
Our own product, built and operated in-house. A full commercial SaaS, not an internal tool.
The platform we use to run our own projects, tasks and time. Operation, management and data in production.
Email marketing, forms, events, certificates, quizzes and participation — modules built to be integrated, not installed and forgotten.
A full digital ecosystem in operation: registration, live participation, certificates, email and data. The case where building, connecting and operating happen in the same place.
We use AI agents inside our own development process — for research, documentation, testing and execution. It's how we work, not a product we're selling you.
See the systems we run today.
Fit
We work best with teams that already have a product, a process and someone to direct the work.
You have a product, a process and someone on your side who sets priorities and directs the work.
You're looking for the lowest hourly rate on the market, there's nobody on your side to set priorities, or what you need is for someone to own the whole project — in that case, ask us about the project model instead.
FAQ
In outsourcing you buy an outcome and we direct the work. In staff augmentation you direct the work and we add capacity to your team. Same engineers, different chain of command.
You do. They join your stand-ups, your sprint and your tools. On our side they keep technical support from the rest of the team, which is the part you don't have to manage.
You tell us and we change it. A bad fit costs more than an empty seat, and pretending otherwise helps nobody.
Yes. That's the point of this model — the work happens inside your process, not in a parallel one that has to be reconciled later.
We work remotely and our hours overlap with US business hours, so scheduling isn't the obstacle it is with teams on the other side of the world.
Often that's how it goes. We do both models, and moving between them doesn't mean starting over with people who don't know your systems.
Next step
Write to us with three things and we can answer properly: which profiles you're looking for, how many people, and when you'd want them to start. If the shape of what you need fits the project model better, we'll tell you.