Separate environments
One place to develop, another to test and the production one. Every change is seen working outside production before a customer uses it.
DevOps and continuous deployment
We build the path every change travels: an environment to test in, a deployment that runs on its own, a rollback ready in case something goes wrong, and monitoring that alerts you. That way updating stops depending on one late night, one set of nerves and one person.
The breaking point
It isn't a lack of care from the team: it's that the path for changes was never built. When shipping is a manual procedure that lives in someone's head, an error isn't a remote possibility, it's the norm.
One thing gets fixed and another falls over, because the change was tested in the wrong place or wasn't tested at all. In the end the team stops shipping, and the improvements pile up without going out.
There's someone who knows the exact order of the steps. If they're on holiday, sick or they leave the company, the operation is left unable to update its own software.
Files were uploaded by hand, something was patched live, something was tested on a Friday. With no record of what was shipped and when, returning the system to a state that worked is guesswork.
How we work
The idea is simple and old: if a step repeats, a machine does it. What automation brings isn't speed, it's that the result is the same every time and that it can be undone.
One place to develop, another to test and the production one. Every change is seen working outside production before a customer uses it.
A single command or a single approval ships the version: it installs, migrates the database, restarts and checks that the service responded. No steps from memory.
The previous state is kept and can be restored. And once the new version is live, monitoring watches that it keeps responding.
This is one piece of operations and support: the server everything lives on is covered by managed IT services, and if what's missing is the system itself, that's software development.
What's covered
When one of these four is missing, the system doesn't break the day you set it up: it breaks the day you ship in a hurry.
Every change is built and run through the automated tests before anyone thinks about shipping it.
A copy of the system where the business can see what's new and sign off on it without touching the live operation.
The new version comes in while the previous one keeps serving, and the change completes when the new one responds correctly.
Undoing isn't improvised in an emergency: the procedure is written down and has been run before it was needed.
How we come in
Nobody stops their operation to set up a new deployment. It's done in parallel, in parts, and the team starts using it as each piece is ready.
1
Who ships, with which steps, where it gets tested and what happened the last time something went wrong. The real gaps come out of that.
2
First the environment to test in, then the automated deployment and the rollback. Each piece is broken in by shipping something small.
3
Your team can keep the written procedure, or we can stay in charge of the deployments. Either option is agreed in writing.
In the diagnostic we review your current deployment and tell you what can be automated first. Book a free assessment.
Fit
If you ship once a year, building this whole path doesn't pay for itself. What you need is backups and someone to attend when it's needed.
We don't sell maturity audits or certifications. We set up the deployment and leave it working; if you need a certified framework, that's another vendor.
Questions
Almost never. The automated deployment is built on top of what you already have. If the current server is what's preventing automation, we say so in the diagnostic and that gets decided separately.
Yes, and it's the usual case. What we need is access to the code and to the server. First we review what's there, and out of that review comes what can be automated as it is.
No. The staging environment and the automation are built alongside what's running. The change of procedure is broken in with a small, controlled release.
The previous state is restored with the rollback procedure, which is tested before it's needed. How long it takes depends on the system: that gets measured in your case and put in writing in the proposal, we don't publish it as a generic figure.
No. The infrastructure accounts and the code are yours, and the procedure stays documented in your repository. If you leave one day, your team can keep shipping without us.
Yes, as long as they do the job. We'd rather use what your team already knows than introduce a new tool nobody wants to maintain.
Next step
With those two answers you can already see where the risk is and what's worth automating first. No strings attached.
Prefer to write to us? Tell us what you need.